Grammar is central to the teaching and learning of
languages. It is also one of the more difficult aspects of language to teach
well.
Many people, including language teachers, hear the
word "grammar" and think of a fixed set of word forms and rules of
usage. They associate "good" grammar with the prestige forms of the
language, such as those used in writing and in formal oral presentations, and
"bad" or "no" grammar with the language used in everyday
conversation or used by speakers of non prestige forms. Language teachers who
adopt this definition focus on grammar as a set of forms and rules. They teach
grammar by explaining the forms and rules and then drilling students on them.
This results in bored, disaffected students who can produce correct forms on
exercises and tests, but consistently make errors when they try to use the
language in context.
Other language teachers, influenced by recent
theoretical work on the difference between language learning and language
acquisition, tend not to teach grammar at all. Believing that children acquire
their first language without overt grammar instruction, they expect students to
learn their second language the same way. They assume that students will absorb
grammar rules as they hear, read, and use the language in communication
activities. This approach does not allow students to use one of the major tools
they have as learners: their active understanding of what grammar is and how it
works in the language they already know.
According to the old translation method, too much
emphasis was placed on grammar. Grammar was thought to be all important and it
dictated the terms of language usage. Children at very young age were made to
study the complicated rules of grammar. But modern educationists are of the
opinion that a pupil who is good at grammar and has studied all the rules will
still make the most elementary mistakes in grammar.
Which method works the best is up to the individual
teacher, but one thing is certain: "there, they're, and their" all
have different meanings, and it is the English teacher's job to make sure this
information is cleverly presented. If it is not presented for the benefit and
advancement of the students, it must be done at least for the sake of nail-biting,
socially disenchanted Grammar police everywhere who look at their news feed on
the internet and shed a little tear with every non-agreeing subject/verb pair.